1. Yeah, I have a feeling it’s Merola. That’s just me though. He’s way too invested in the hashtag in his movie to just let it drop.


  2. He’s prepared to accept absence of negative evidence as positive evidence when it agrees with his views but then attempts to criticise skeptics for not possessing Burzynski trial data and claims that inability of skeptics to show that Burzynski treatments don’t work is evidence that they do work! Then there’s the whole Burzynski PhD saga……
    Can’t decide whether he’s a true believer, a mark or a shill. Maybe some combination of them all!

  3. flip

    After all his comments on RI, I think somewhere in there is a bit of a fallacious thinking whereby all of SBM should be criticised, and by focusing on one particular person – Burzyinski – without ‘evidence’ of Burzyinski doing anything wrong, the skeptics are therefore wrong and should be criticising everyone else instead/as well. Or some such. But outside of that, I’m going with troll.

  4. iambreastcancer

    I wonder what Wayne Dolcefino, Burzynski’s “reputation management” spokesman, has to say about this clown. He’s been notably obscure lately.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *